Psychology Reader

What Counts as Recovery From an Eating Disorder?

Anna M. Bardone-Cone, Megan B. Harney, Christine R. Maldonado, and 4 others · 2010 · Behaviour Research and Therapy

Role
Methodological contribution
Difficulty
Moderate
Full work length
9 pages
Type
Journal article

Access

Psychology Reader links to legitimate sources and does not host article PDFs.

Reading focus

Syllabus: How Do Eating Disorders Develop and Persist?

Separate physical, behavioral and psychological criteria from the additional measures used to evaluate recovery.

Why you’re reading it. Define the endpoint before interpreting evidence about how often or how quickly it occurs.

A question to consider. Describe a hypothetical pattern of improvement that meets some criteria but not others. Which meaningful change would a binary label hide?

Why this reading

A recovery rate cannot be interpreted without knowing what recovery means. Bardone-Cone and colleagues propose physical, behavioral and psychological criteria, then compare the resulting groups on other measures. The paper turns an apparently simple endpoint into a question of construct definition, validation and what remains outside the definition.

Before you read

Operationalization specifies how a concept will be measured. Construct validation asks whether the resulting measure behaves as expected in relevant comparisons. Defining recovery using one set of measures and evaluating it using closely related measures can support consistency without establishing every aspect of validity.

Read for

  1. Separate the criteria that define each group from the outcomes used to evaluate those groups.
  2. Compare eating-related beliefs, psychosocial functioning and other psychiatric difficulties rather than treating them as interchangeable.
  3. Examine recruitment, nonparticipation and group sizes before interpreting apparent similarity to healthy controls.

Consider afterwards

  1. Could someone improve in everyday functioning without meeting every recovery criterion? Explain what the study’s definition would capture and miss.
  2. What prospective evidence would strengthen the case that this definition identifies a durable recovery?

Editorial context

This was a cross-sectional study of a selected, predominantly White female sample, with substantial nonparticipation and small recovered groups. It evaluates one proposed definition; it does not establish a universal standard, demonstrate future freedom from relapse or cover every presentation. The distinction between eating-disorder recovery and the absence of all other psychological difficulties remains important.