Psychology Reader

Creating Good Relationships: Responsiveness, Relationship Quality, and Interpersonal Goals

Amy Canevello and Jennifer Crocker · 2010 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Role
Methodological contribution · Landmark empirical study
Difficulty
Challenging
Full work length
29 pages
Type
Journal article

Access

Psychology Reader links to legitimate sources and does not host article PDFs.

Reading focus

Syllabus: How Do Close Relationships Form and Function?

Use the responsiveness framework to separate projection from reciprocal influence.

Why you’re reading it. Apply interdependence to a nonromantic relationship and inspect what reports from both people add.

A question to consider. Both roommates report greater care after a less stressful week. Which pathways could reflect their interaction, and which could reflect a shared change in circumstances?

Why this reading

Canevello and Crocker ask how responsiveness might develop between people over time. Studying both members of roommate pairs lets them distinguish a person's interpretation of a relationship from responses also reported by the other person.

Before you read

Perceived responsiveness means feeling understood, valued, and supported. An actor is the person whose predictors are being examined; the partner is the other member of the pair. Within-person change is different from a comparison between people who usually score high or low.

Read for

  1. Separate compassionate goals, self-image goals, reported behavior, and perceptions of a partner; inspect where their measures overlap.
  2. Trace a within-person pathway and a cross-partner pathway in the figures, identifying who supplied each report.
  3. Compare daily, weekly, and longer-term results, including associations that do not recur across timescales.

Consider afterwards

  1. Both roommates report a better relationship after one becomes more attentive. What evidence would help separate reciprocal influence, changed interpretation, and a shared improvement in circumstances?

Editorial context

The two observational studies involved first-semester, same-sex college roommates, predominantly women and White students. Repeated reports and statistical adjustment strengthen some comparisons but do not randomize people's goals or prove the direction of every pathway. The authors acknowledge overlapping measures and the difficulty of separating intentions from enacted responsiveness. The results are not evidence that a person can make any relationship safe or reciprocal through sufficient care.