Psychology Reader

Pubertal Development: Correspondence Between Hormonal and Physical Development

Elizabeth A Shirtcliff, Ronald E Dahl, and Seth D Pollak · 2009 · Child Development

Role
Methodological contribution
Difficulty
Moderate
Full work length
11 pages
Type
Journal article

Access

Psychology Reader links to legitimate sources and does not host article PDFs.

Reading focus

Syllabus: What Changes During Adolescence?

Turn the opening discussion of categories into a measurement problem. Compare age, physical development, self-perception, and hormones without assuming that one can stand in for all the others.

A question to consider. If same-age adolescents make different decisions, what would you measure before attributing the difference to puberty?

Why this reading

Puberty is often treated as one variable. This study compares self-reports, physical examinations, and hormone measurements, making their differences visible. It shows why the best measure depends on the developmental question.

Before you read

Pubertal status describes development at assessment; timing describes development relative to peers. Tanner stages classify physical changes. Correlation measures association, whereas agreement asks whether methods give the same classification. Repeated hormone samples help separate baseline levels from daily fluctuation.

Read for

  1. Compare the questions answered by the three measurement approaches.
  2. Explain how measures can correlate strongly yet disagree about individuals’ stages.
  3. Follow how repeated sampling and the different hormone results qualify the conclusions.

Consider afterwards

  1. A study uses age to explain mood changes through puberty. Which additional measures would let that proposed explanation be examined?

Editorial context

The sample comprised 160 children aged 9–14. The study compares measures rather than tracing each participant’s entire pubertal trajectory. Physical measures did not capture all hormonal variation, and estradiol measurement had particular limitations. The study’s sex-based measurement groups should not be treated as measures of gender identity.