Psychology Reader

Neural Regulation of Endocrine and Autonomic Stress Responses

Yvonne M. Ulrich-Lai and James P. Herman · 2009 · Nature Reviews Neuroscience

Role
Major synthesis
Difficulty
Challenging
Full work length
13 pages
Type
Journal article

Access

Psychology Reader links to legitimate sources and does not host article PDFs.

Reading focus

Syllabus: How Do Brain and Body Regulate Each Other?

Trace the autonomic and HPA pathways and their feedback. They supply a mechanistic basis for interpreting the human experiment that follows.

A question to consider. Specify a sampling schedule that could distinguish a rapid autonomic response, a later hormonal response, and recovery after a demanding task.

Why this reading

Stress physiology involves coordinated responses with different pathways and timescales. Ulrich-Lai and Herman explain how autonomic and hormonal activity is initiated, modified, and limited by feedback. Their synthesis makes it possible to question an explanation that assigns all stress to one hormone or one brain region.

Before you read

The autonomic nervous system regulates organs through sympathetic and parasympathetic pathways. The hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal, or HPA, axis is a hormonal pathway: hypothalamic signals stimulate pituitary adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), which stimulates adrenal glucocorticoid release. Cortisol is a principal human glucocorticoid; corticosterone is commonly measured in rodent studies. Feedback allows the resulting signals to influence their own regulation. Receptors differ in affinity and in the effects they mediate, so concentration alone does not specify a response.

Read for

  1. Trace autonomic and endocrine pathways separately before considering their coordination. Note their different timing and the measurements needed to follow each.
  2. Compare responses to direct bodily disturbances with responses depending on interpretation or learned context. The pathways overlap without being identical.
  3. Identify which conclusions come from lesions or other interventions, which from recordings, and which remain circuit proposals. Repeated exposure may produce habituation to one challenge and sensitization to another.

Consider afterwards

  1. Heart rate rises during a task but cortisol has not risen in an immediate sample. Why is that insufficient evidence that the endocrine system was uninvolved?
  2. How could repeated sampling and a novel stressor distinguish habituation from a general loss of responsiveness?

Editorial context

The article is a selective mechanistic review published in 2009, with substantial reliance on animal preparations. Brain-region effects depend on subregions, connections, and the challenge studied; a diagram should not be read as a complete contemporary circuit atlas. Physiological activation is not inherently damage, and a weak response is not necessarily healthy recovery. The synthesis provides mechanisms to examine rather than a diagnostic interpretation of an individual's cortisol result.