How Can Therapy Change Recurring Interpersonal Patterns?
Relationship expectations, insight, current roles and mentalization
- Level
- Introductory
- Reading load
- 9 core readings in 5 units
- Prerequisites
- No clinical training is required. The Psychotherapy foundation and therapeutic-relationship syllabus provide useful preparation. The guides introduce formulation, transference, mediation and mentalization. The theoretical synthesis and process analyses are the most demanding works.
- Last reviewed
- September 2026
Introduction
Some difficulties recur between people: expecting rejection, withdrawing from disagreement, or being unable to ask for support. Recognizing a pattern leaves its explanation and change unsettled. Other people's conduct, unequal power, and material circumstances also enter the history. What could therapy contribute, and what evidence would show how that contribution works?
This path begins by asking what makes a difficulty an interpersonal pattern rather than a fixed trait or an explanation contained entirely within one person. A psychodynamic synthesis then distinguishes possible targets of change from the techniques used to address them. The next studies examine work on transference: patterns of expectation and relating that appear in the relationship with the therapist. Comparing the effects of interpreting those patterns is a different task from showing that a particular kind of understanding produces improvement.
The next unit turns to interpersonal therapy and its attention to current problems, roles, and support. A study examining recorded interventions asks how well they address a recurring relationship theme. Mentalization offers another proposal: attending to how we understand our own and other people's thoughts and feelings, especially when a relationship is under strain.
The closing studies extend the question to ordinary services and life after treatment. Do changes in symptoms coincide with changes in relationships and everyday functioning? What can follow-up evidence establish, and which comparisons still leave the mechanism uncertain?
By the end, you should be able to compare these accounts, distinguish evidence about a technique from evidence about the process through which it helps, and assess the outcomes each study measures. You will also track whether papers report on the same participants or provide evidence from a different setting. The purpose is to evaluate explanations and research, not to learn a treatment protocol.
Unit 1 of 5
What makes a relationship pattern recur—and what might change it?
Hopwood offers a language for interactions unfolding over time. Gabbard and Westen propose several routes to change within psychoanalytic thinking. Keep description, explanation and intervention separate, and ask whether the account leaves room for the other person and the surrounding circumstances.
Reading
1 of 9Interpersonal Dynamics in Personality and Personality Disorders
Hopwood, C. J. (2018). Interpersonal dynamics in personality and personality disorders. European Journal of Personality, 32(5), 499–524. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2155
Foundational argument · Challenging · Full work: 26 pages
Follow how expectations, perceptions and responses unfold between people rather than treating a trait label as an explanation.
Why you’re reading it. Establish what a recurring interpersonal pattern could mean before choosing a treatment account.
A question to consider. If someone withdraws after criticism, what observations would distinguish a recurring expectation from an accurate response to a hostile setting?
Reading
2 of 9Rethinking Therapeutic Action
Gabbard, G. O., & Westen, D. (2003). Rethinking therapeutic action. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 84(4), 823–841. https://doi.org/10.1516/n4t0-4d5g-nnpl-h7nl
Foundational argument · Major synthesis · Challenging · Full work: 19 pages
Separate targets of change from insight, relationship experience and other proposed interventions.
Why you’re reading it. Give psychodynamic thinking a substantive account of change to examine.
A question to consider. For the withdrawal pattern, how might understanding an expectation and experiencing a different response make different predictions?
Unit 2 of 5
What could understanding a pattern change?
These papers use the same Norwegian trial cohort. Høglend and colleagues test a treatment component; Johansson and colleagues analyze a possible pathway through insight. Their different questions justify reading both, but they do not count as independent replications.
Reading
3 of 9Do Transference Interpretations Have Sustained Effects?
Høglend, P., Bøgwald, K.-P., Amlo, S., Marble, A., Ulberg, R., Sjaastad, M. C., Sørbye, Ø., Heyerdahl, O., & Johansson, P. (2008). Transference interpretations in dynamic psychotherapy: Do they really yield sustained effects? American Journal of Psychiatry, 165(6), 763–771. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.07061028
Methodological contribution · Moderate · Full work: 9 pages
Compare the overall contrast with the moderator findings and distinguish outcome scales from clinical illustrations.
Why you’re reading it. Test one technique within the broader account of therapeutic action.
A question to consider. If the average difference is small but a subgroup appears to benefit, what would justify treating that subgroup result as a useful prediction?
Reading
4 of 9Does Insight Help Explain Lasting Improvement?
Johansson, P., Høglend, P., Ulberg, R., Amlo, S., Marble, A., Bøgwald, K.-P., Sørbye, Ø., Sjaastad, M. C., & Heyerdahl, O. (2010). The mediating role of insight for long-term improvements in psychodynamic therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78(3), 438–448. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019245
Methodological contribution · Challenging · Full work: 11 pages
Follow the timing of insight and interpersonal functioning while keeping track of the shared participants.
Why you’re reading it. Ask whether a plausible mechanism has stronger support than an association between two improvements.
A question to consider. What alternative process could explain both greater understanding during therapy and better relationships afterward?
Unit 3 of 5
How can current relationships and roles become targets?
IPT locates a focal problem in present relationships and roles. The process study then makes one kind of interpersonal fit measurable. Its comparison includes cognitive therapy, so consider whether the measure captures what matters equally well in both approaches.
Reading
5 of 9Mechanisms of Change in Interpersonal Therapy
Lipsitz, J. D., & Markowitz, J. C. (2013). Mechanisms of change in interpersonal therapy (IPT). Clinical Psychology Review, 33(8), 1134–1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2013.09.002
Foundational argument · Major synthesis · Moderate · Full work: 14 pages
Connect social support, stress, emotional processing and skills to the chosen interpersonal problem.
Why you’re reading it. Introduce a current-context account that can be compared with insight and relationship history.
A question to consider. After a job loss changes someone’s family role, which proposed pathway would you measure first, and what would count against it?
Reading
6 of 9Interpersonal Accuracy and Therapy Outcome
Crits-Christoph, P., Gibbons, M. B. C., Temes, C. M., Elkin, I., & Gallop, R. (2010). Interpersonal accuracy of interventions and the outcome of cognitive and interpersonal therapies for depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78(3), 420–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019549
Methodological contribution · Challenging · Full work: 9 pages
Examine how coded relationship themes define accuracy and how its outcome association differs across therapies.
Why you’re reading it. Turn an appealing claim about understanding a patient into a measurement and inference problem.
A question to consider. If a statement matches the coded theme but is unhelpful to the person, what has the measure captured and what has it missed?
Unit 4 of 5
What changes when we reconsider another person’s mind?
The mentalization overview introduces a stance of curiosity and uncertainty as well as a structured program. The independent public-service trial tests a delivered package, including organizational differences. A treatment effect and a mentalizing mechanism require different evidence.
Reading
7 of 9Mentalization-Based Treatment
Bateman, A., & Fonagy, P. (2010). Mentalization based treatment for borderline personality disorder. World Psychiatry, 9(1), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2051-5545.2010.tb00255.x
Foundational argument · Accessible · Full work: 5 pages
Distinguish mentalizing from confident interpretation, agreement and empathy.
Why you’re reading it. Compare a third account of interpersonal change with insight and current-role work.
A question to consider. When a patient believes the therapist is angry, what would distinguish curiosity about both perspectives from assuming the patient is mistaken?
Reading
8 of 9Mentalization Treatment in a Public Health Service
Carlyle, D., Green, R., Inder, M., Porter, R., Crowe, M., Mulder, R., & Frampton, C. (2020). A randomized-controlled trial of mentalization-based treatment compared with structured case management for borderline personality disorder in a mainstream public health service. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, Article 561916. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.561916
Contemporary update · Critical reappraisal · Moderate · Full work: 9 pages
Compare overall self-harm with its separate outcomes and inspect continuity of case management.
Why you’re reading it. Evaluate what happens when a proposed treatment is delivered in an ordinary service.
A question to consider. Which conclusion concerns the delivered packages, and which would require isolating mentalizing or case-manager continuity?
Unit 5 of 5
Does change travel beyond therapy?
The final paper follows a different cohort: participants in the original UK MBT-versus-structured-management trial, not the New Zealand service study. Its methods introduce that earlier trial; the original report is an optional extension. Compare timescales, retention and outcomes rather than treating cross-study differences as a randomized test.
Reading
9 of 9Mentalization Treatment: An Eight-Year Follow-Up
Bateman, A., Constantinou, M. P., Fonagy, P., & Holzer, S. (2021). Eight-year prospective follow-up of mentalization-based treatment versus structured clinical management for people with borderline personality disorder. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 12(4), 291–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000422
Contemporary update · Moderate · Full work: 9 pages
Track the original allocation, changing follow-up sample, later care and different meanings of functioning.
Why you’re reading it. Judge whether durable benefit reaches beyond fewer crises or a persuasive account of in-session change.
A question to consider. What combination of participant-defined goals, relationship measures and service data would make the claim of lasting improvement more convincing?
Scope and omissions
This path compares selected psychodynamic, interpersonal and mentalization proposals, using research on depression, mixed outpatient difficulties and borderline personality disorder. It is not a history of psychoanalysis, a treatment manual or a ranking of schools. Several studies come from relatively small adult samples and specialist settings; they do not represent every culture, relationship or source of distress. MBT examples combine individual and group work, although this path’s question concerns interpersonal processes rather than group mechanisms. Couple, family and group interventions require a separate examination. Persistent hostility, discrimination or material adversity must not be redescribed automatically as a patient’s distorted pattern.
Synthesis
Recurring interpersonal difficulty can be approached through immediate exchanges, meanings formed in experience, current role problems, and the capacity to consider mental states. These approaches suggest different targets. Yet altering an interpretation, a relationship, or a service can affect several processes together. An explanation must show what it expects to change and how evidence could distinguish its account from the alternatives.
The studies strengthen some claims while leaving others open. Randomizing a technique supports a different inference from observing insight; coding accuracy makes an interpretation measurable without making it unquestionably true. Routine-service comparisons and long-term follow-up broaden the evidence but introduce implementation, retention and outcome-definition problems. Fewer crises, better relationships and greater participation are related possibilities, not interchangeable definitions of recovery.
For a closer look at collaboration, responsiveness and ruptures within treatment itself, return to How Does the Therapeutic Relationship Contribute to Change?.
To examine therapeutic work involving partners, relatives and group members, continue with How Can Couples, Families and Groups Become Settings for Change?.
Further reading
Optional. Not part of the core sequence.
- Crits-Christoph, P., Cooper, A., & Luborsky, L. (1988). The accuracy of therapists' interpretations and the outcome of dynamic psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56(4), 490–495. Paper. An earlier study of interpretation accuracy in dynamic psychotherapy. Compare its coding and outcome question with the later cross-treatment process analysis.
- Høglend, P., Amlo, S., Marble, A., Bøgwald, K.-P., Sørbye, Ø., Sjaastad, M. C., & Heyerdahl, O. (2006). Analysis of the patient-therapist relationship in dynamic psychotherapy: An experimental study of transference interpretations. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163(10), 1739–1746. Paper. The initial report from the same cohort as the sustained-effects and insight papers. It extends the treatment-component design; it is not another independent sample.
- Markowitz, J. C., & Weissman, M. M. (2012). Interpersonal psychotherapy: Past, present and future. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 19(2), 99–105. Paper. A historical account of IPT’s development and adaptations. It broadens the background without substituting a history for the core mechanism argument.
- Driessen, E., Hegelmaier, L. M., Abbass, A. A., Barber, J. P., Dekker, J. J. M., Van, H. L., Jansma, E. P., & Cuijpers, P. (2015). The efficacy of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy for depression: A meta-analysis update. Clinical Psychology Review, 42, 1–15. Paper. An outcome synthesis of short-term psychodynamic treatment for depression. It addresses benefit across studies, a different question from whether insight explains change.
- Luyten, P., Campbell, C., Allison, E., & Fonagy, P. (2020). The mentalizing approach to psychopathology: State of the art and future directions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 16(1), 297–325. Paper. A broader review of mentalizing in psychopathology and intervention. Use it to examine the construct’s scope beyond a single diagnosis or program.
- Bateman, A., & Fonagy, P. (2009). Randomized controlled trial of outpatient mentalization-based treatment versus structured clinical management for borderline personality disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 166(12), 1355–1364. Paper. The original UK outpatient trial underlying the eight-year follow-up. It supplies additional detail about the initial comparison; it is a different cohort from Carlyle and colleagues’ public-service study.