Psychology Reader

Mechanisms of Change in Interpersonal Therapy

Joshua D. Lipsitz and John C. Markowitz · 2013 · Clinical Psychology Review

Role
Foundational argument · Major synthesis
Difficulty
Moderate
Full work length
14 pages
Type
Journal article

Access

Psychology Reader links to legitimate sources and does not host article PDFs.

Reading focus

Syllabus: How Can Therapy Change Recurring Interpersonal Patterns?

Connect social support, stress, emotional processing and skills to the chosen interpersonal problem.

Why you’re reading it. Introduce a current-context account that can be compared with insight and relationship history.

A question to consider. After a job loss changes someone’s family role, which proposed pathway would you measure first, and what would count against it?

Why this reading

This account gives current relationships a specific role in explaining therapeutic change. It proposes pathways involving social support, interpersonal stress, emotional processing and skills, while asking how resolving a focal problem could affect symptoms.

Before you read

Interpersonal therapy organizes work around a current problem such as grief, a role dispute or a role transition. A proposed mechanism is a process intended to explain benefit; an effective treatment package does not establish which proposed process produced it.

Read for

  1. Trace how the four proposed pathways connect the interpersonal problem to symptoms.
  2. Notice the difference between perceived and available support, and between a patient’s changes and other people’s responses.

Consider afterwards

  1. How might an improved relationship reduce symptoms, and how might symptom improvement change that relationship?
  2. What observation would challenge the assumption that resolving one focal problem improves a person’s broader circumstances?

Editorial context

The authors distinguish substantial outcome research from the limited direct mechanism evidence available in 2013. Their account is a research framework, not proof of all four pathways. A person cannot control the contributions of others, and persistent material or social adversity may limit what changing one relationship can accomplish.